This project is read-only.

Does .Contains work?

Jan 30, 2012 at 5:02 AM

Hey guys when I use .Contains it prints out: "Yes, somehow this method is getting called." in my console. Is there something like this that does the same things, but works? Thanks Guys - Matt

Jan 30, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Use a for loop to recurse through and check each variable seperatly.

On Jan 29, 2012 10:02 PM, "civilwarrock" <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:
>
> From: civilwarrock
>
> Hey guys when I use .Contains it prints out: "Yes, somehow this method is getting called." in my console. Is there something like this that does the same things, but works? Thanks Guys - Matt
>
> Read the full discussion online.
>
> To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (Cosmos@discussions.codeplex.com)
>
> To start a new discussion for this project, email Cosmos@discussions.codeplex.com
>
> You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.
>
> Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

Jan 31, 2012 at 7:17 AM
joshbeitler wrote:

Use a for loop to recurse through and check each variable seperatly.

On Jan 29, 2012 10:02 PM, "civilwarrock" <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:
>
> From: civilwarrock
>
> Hey guys when I use .Contains it prints out: "Yes, somehow this method is getting called." in my console. Is there something like this that does the same things, but works? Thanks Guys - Matt
>
> Read the full discussion online.
>
> To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (Cosmos@discussions.codeplex.com)
>
> To start a new discussion for this project, email Cosmos@discussions.codeplex.com
>
> You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.
>
> Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

I thought about doing that. Oh well I just modified my code to use .substring instead. No big deal. Thanks - Matt